2. vE Jrod (4-2 Middleweight Champion) Whilst Jrod doesn't have the most amazing record, he was the most dominate LW champion and is still a dominate force.
3. Evil97 (2-0 WelterWeight Champion) With only 2 wins, it is a tough choice to play Evil in 3rd, However his 2 wins where over the current HW Champion (Jok3r) and the former WW Champion (iKlipps)
4. Jok3er3700 (3-1 Heavyweight Champion) Once again this is a tough choice to make, however he has defended his title once already, in dominate fashion.
5. Abstrakt Fists (2-1 Light Heavyweight Champion) The Final member of the top 5, In by the skin of his teeth, although he is undefeated in his weight class and has a win over NRG4WAR in dominate fashion.
6. Eod jjsw1ft (4-1) Eod jjsw1ft, Some criticize the level of opponents he is matched with and the way he fights, however you can not fault his awesome record, with his only loss coming to the LW champion Possibly me, Eod is the Jon Fitch of EA MMA.
7. iKLiPPzZ (4-2) iKLiPPzZ a Champions Champion, Devastating stand up and an ever improving ground game.
8. COREY471ISGAY (3-0) Whilst his record is more impressive than iKLiPPzZ, he is not a former champion, it will be interesting to see how he will match up with some top guys.
9. UFCPker (3-2) Pker Always put on exciting fights
10. TheDivineAlpha (3-2) DivineAlpha, Yup.
I guess it is up to the community and Rupp dat as to who's list is more realistic/legitimate.
If the community/Rupp likes this System more than Chinos, i will Update every week.|||I will finish this in the morning.|||You would place yourself in #1, nuff said.|||
You would place yourself in #1, nuff said.
Who would be above me?|||like i said to chino, you should do it by weights as well.
what you have up should be turned into a p4p or something.
for example LHW Ranking would start with the champ abstrakt as #1 and so on. that would help people climb the ladder towards a shot.
you can use sherdog rankings as a guide.|||
I'm just going to start off by saying holding the lightweight championship is liking getting a free toy in a Happy Meal. Jrod in my opinion has many more accomplishments, holding the MW title is much more to say than holding the free toy belt. :)|||
You would place yourself in #1, nuff said.
Who would be above me?
like i said to chino, you should do it by weights as well.
what you have up should be turned into a p4p or something.
for example LHW Ranking would start with the champ abstrakt as #1 and so on. that would help people climb the ladder towards a shot.
you can use sherdog rankings as a guide.
Thanks for the input, but there is no set WC for fighters, fighters pick where to fight.
Yes, I understand that. What I am saying is you list the records of fighters in a certain weight and rank them. Someone can be ranked in 2 weights or more.
Let's say for example you're 4-0 in LW but then move up to WW for 2 weeks and become 2-0 in WW. You'll have a rank in LW of 4-0 and and a rank in WW of 2-0. Then the fighters for each weight bracket will be ranked according to their records in THAT weight and that determines whose next for a shot.
Like now you're ranked 1 in LW since you're the champ but you're probably not ranked at all in HW therefore you will have to beat someone on the HW rankings or work your way up in that weight for a title shot. Get it?|||
like i said to chino, you should do it by weights as well.
what you have up should be turned into a p4p or something.
for example LHW Ranking would start with the champ abstrakt as #1 and so on. that would help people climb the ladder towards a shot.
you can use sherdog rankings as a guide.
Thanks for the input, but there is no set WC for fighters, fighters pick where to fight.
Yes, I understand that. What I am saying is you list the records of fighters in a certain weight and rank them. Someone can be ranked in 2 weights or more.
Let's say for example you're 4-0 in LW but then move up to WW for 2 weeks and become 2-0 in WW. You'll have a rank in LW of 4-0 and and a rank in WW of 2-0. Then the fighters for each weight bracket will be ranked according to their records in THAT weight and that determines whose next for a shot.
Like now you're ranked 1 in LW since you're the champ but you're probably not ranked at all in HW therefore you will have to beat someone on the HW rankings or work your way up in that weight for a title shot. Get it?
No bro, i completly understand and it would be cool but You have the problem off people switching WC every time they lose.
If there was a rule that you can only fight in 1 or 2 WC's then this would work.
|||
like i said to chino, you should do it by weights as well.
what you have up should be turned into a p4p or something.
for example LHW Ranking would start with the champ abstrakt as #1 and so on. that would help people climb the ladder towards a shot.
you can use sherdog rankings as a guide.
Thanks for the input, but there is no set WC for fighters, fighters pick where to fight.
Yes, I understand that. What I am saying is you list the records of fighters in a certain weight and rank them. Someone can be ranked in 2 weights or more.
Let's say for example you're 4-0 in LW but then move up to WW for 2 weeks and become 2-0 in WW. You'll have a rank in LW of 4-0 and and a rank in WW of 2-0. Then the fighters for each weight bracket will be ranked according to their records in THAT weight and that determines whose next for a shot.
Like now you're ranked 1 in LW since you're the champ but you're probably not ranked at all in HW therefore you will have to beat someone on the HW rankings or work your way up in that weight for a title shot. Get it?
No bro, i completly understand and it would be cool but You have the problem off people switching WC every time they lose.
If there was a rule that you can only fight in 1 or 2 WC's then this would work.
edit this might work better after a few more cards|||
like i said to chino, you should do it by weights as well.
what you have up should be turned into a p4p or something.
for example LHW Ranking would start with the champ abstrakt as #1 and so on. that would help people climb the ladder towards a shot.
you can use sherdog rankings as a guide.
Thanks for the input, but there is no set WC for fighters, fighters pick where to fight.
Yes, I understand that. What I am saying is you list the records of fighters in a certain weight and rank them. Someone can be ranked in 2 weights or more.
Let's say for example you're 4-0 in LW but then move up to WW for 2 weeks and become 2-0 in WW. You'll have a rank in LW of 4-0 and and a rank in WW of 2-0. Then the fighters for each weight bracket will be ranked according to their records in THAT weight and that determines whose next for a shot.
Like now you're ranked 1 in LW since you're the champ but you're probably not ranked at all in HW therefore you will have to beat someone on the HW rankings or work your way up in that weight for a title shot. Get it?
No bro, i completly understand and it would be cool but You have the problem off people switching WC every time they lose.
If there was a rule that you can only fight in 1 or 2 WC's then this would work.
edit this might work better after a few more cards
Yeah, we shall see.|||Yeah this is more what i anticipated when we started talking about rankings.|||
I just see people complaining who are not in the top 5 of my rankings. I'm pretty sure most people klippz fought could beat you and that's why I think mine is more fair.|||In ranked at some point ive beat not only klippz but everyone he has played so you assume wrong.
Yeah this is more what i anticipated when we started talking about rankings.
Ufcpker is in your top ten already and complaining about your rankings. So that statement was also incorrect.
I dont know why you think I suck. Im not number 1 but there is no way im not top ten inside this league or outside.
|||
I just see people complaining who are not in the top 5 of my rankings. I'm pretty sure most people klippz fought could beat you and that's why I think mine is more fair.
Yeah this is more what i anticipated when we started talking about rankings.
There complaining because its a flawed system just going off of # of wins. You could have a guy that's 5-4 over a guy who is 4-0, even if the guy who is 4-0 gave the guy who's 5-4 all 4 losses.
No comments:
Post a Comment