Thursday, April 26, 2012

Stikforce rankings

Ehh, cbf with this. There are more simple minded nerds out there, who just for the sake to impress everyone on the internet, can do this better than I can(apparently). So let the nerd do it have fun :).|||I'm 2-0. W's over Joker and Klippzz
It's kind of pointless to have rankings based on records alone. Guys at the bottom with losses against top guys and some guys at the top with wins over lesser. Not taking anything away from anybody, all fights are tough, it just isn't that accurate to do it like that. IMO
Current champs: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5574721.page|||



I NEED SOMEONE TO TELL ME THE CURRENT CHAMPIONS FOR EACH WEIGHT CLASS SO I CAN PUT THAT BESIDE THEIR NAME FOR FULL RANKING CREDITS.


http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5574721.page|||


I'm 2-0. W's over Joker and Klippzz
It's kind of pointless to have rankings based on records alone. Guys at the bottom with losses against top guys and some guys at the top with wins over lesser. Not taking anything away from anybody, all fights are tough, it just isn't that accurate to do it like that. IMO
Current champs: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5574721.page
It's just that I don't want to go through the process of giving my opinion of who is a tough opponent or not. Like if I made Possibly Me like number 5 and he has top wins for now, he would call the ranking system bias and think it's because I don't like him to much and many more examples of that happening. I will base off of wins and like if someone beats a champion and they are like 3-2 record and the champion is say rank 4 and 3-2 record is like 9 he would obviously rank because of his victory. Like I said before making this thing I would need a little help.|||




I'm 2-0. W's over Joker and Klippzz
It's kind of pointless to have rankings based on records alone. Guys at the bottom with losses against top guys and some guys at the top with wins over lesser. Not taking anything away from anybody, all fights are tough, it just isn't that accurate to do it like that. IMO
Current champs: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5574721.page
It's just that I don't want to go through the process of giving my opinion of who is a tough opponent or not. Like if I made Possibly Me like number 5 and he has top wins for now, he would call the ranking system bias and think it's because I don't like him to much and many more examples of that happening. I will base off of wins and like if someone beats a champion and they are like 3-2 record and the champion is say rank 4 and 3-2 record is like 9 he would obviously rank because of his victory. Like I said before making this thing I would need a little help.

Understood, appreciate the work. I noticed a bunch of incorrect records but the list is gone. I think you forgot to add the actual live broadcast event in the mix, or maybe something else. The archive is here: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5755776.page but it doesn't include the live broadcast.|||






I'm 2-0. W's over Joker and Klippzz
It's kind of pointless to have rankings based on records alone. Guys at the bottom with losses against top guys and some guys at the top with wins over lesser. Not taking anything away from anybody, all fights are tough, it just isn't that accurate to do it like that. IMO
Current champs: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5574721.page
It's just that I don't want to go through the process of giving my opinion of who is a tough opponent or not. Like if I made Possibly Me like number 5 and he has top wins for now, he would call the ranking system bias and think it's because I don't like him to much and many more examples of that happening. I will base off of wins and like if someone beats a champion and they are like 3-2 record and the champion is say rank 4 and 3-2 record is like 9 he would obviously rank because of his victory. Like I said before making this thing I would need a little help.

Understood, appreciate the work. I noticed a bunch of incorrect records but the list is gone. I think you forgot to add the actual live broadcast event in the mix, or maybe something else. The archive is here: http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5755776.page but it doesn't include the live broadcast.
Also If opponents are tied I will look all their opponents up they have fought and determine then which is tie breaker.|||and you can find the full LB history here.
http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/5523371.page
|||UPDATED WITH ALL STIKFORCE LB AND WEEKLY CARDS TOP TENS. Please give your opinion on the ties and who should be above each other
Ex. "o 2Good2Btru3 o" and "COREY471ISGAY " Who has fought better opponents and should be on top. Every time there is a tie I would like assistant on who should be above the other. I will add all of them later :).|||I have only had one loss on Stikforce and that was to austyn who I destroyed in that fight and in the fight the next week that I won.
I also think I should be higher than eod since I believe I've fought tougher competition and I'm a champ and I'm not sure but I dont think I've had one close fight in Stikforce, all of them were pretty dominant.
As for the other 2, I'm not sure cause idk who they've fought|||


I have only had one loss on Stikforce and that was to austyn who I destroyed in that fight and in the fight the next week that I won.
I also think I should be higher than eod since I believe I've fought tougher competition and I'm a champ and I'm not sure but I dont think I've had one close fight in Stikforce, all of them were pretty dominant.
As for the other 2, I'm not sure cause idk who they've fought
You lost to MMA champ also. I am going by archives so go look at them and tell them if their wrong.|||




I have only had one loss on Stikforce and that was to austyn who I destroyed in that fight and in the fight the next week that I won.
I also think I should be higher than eod since I believe I've fought tougher competition and I'm a champ and I'm not sure but I dont think I've had one close fight in Stikforce, all of them were pretty dominant.
As for the other 2, I'm not sure cause idk who they've fought
You lost to MMA champ also. I am going by archives so go look at them and tell them if their wrong.

That was before Stikforce I believe. If it wasnt then my bad|||






I have only had one loss on Stikforce and that was to austyn who I destroyed in that fight and in the fight the next week that I won.
I also think I should be higher than eod since I believe I've fought tougher competition and I'm a champ and I'm not sure but I dont think I've had one close fight in Stikforce, all of them were pretty dominant.
As for the other 2, I'm not sure cause idk who they've fought
You lost to MMA champ also. I am going by archives so go look at them and tell them if their wrong.

That was before Stikforce I believe. If it wasnt then my bad
Isn't the tailgate party considered stikforce?|||Hey good idea chino. Maybe you should also do rankings sorted by the weight class. For example someone might be 0-1 at LW but 4-0 at HW. This will help determine their progress towards title shots for that weight.|||


I have only had one loss on Stikforce and that was to austyn who I destroyed in that fight and in the fight the next week that I won.
I also think I should be higher than eod since I believe I've fought tougher competition and I'm a champ and I'm not sure but I dont think I've had one close fight in Stikforce, all of them were pretty dominant.
As for the other 2, I'm not sure cause idk who they've fought
Also you would be alot higher if some nerds decide not to exploit the game. But I am just trying to be fair.|||




I have only had one loss on Stikforce and that was to austyn who I destroyed in that fight and in the fight the next week that I won.
I also think I should be higher than eod since I believe I've fought tougher competition and I'm a champ and I'm not sure but I dont think I've had one close fight in Stikforce, all of them were pretty dominant.
As for the other 2, I'm not sure cause idk who they've fought
Also you would be alot higher if some nerds decide not to exploit the game. But I am just trying to be fair.

No ones higher than me.

No comments:

Post a Comment